Click here to switch to the mirror at domain Netscape
The Laboratory of Viral RNA Biochemistry

Нажмите, чтобы посмотреть русскую версию

Set up as a research group in December, 1985, and became laboratory in December, 1998

Molecular Colony Technique
Cell-free gene expression
RNA recombination
Sequencing on oligonucleotide arrays
DNA colonies
   
Plasmid isolation without RNases
   

New 5-year award from the
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
(click to read the HHMI press-release)

Click to see the meeting report

People

Alexander Chetverin, Ph.D., D.Sc.
Laboratory Head
Corresponding Member
of the Russian Academy of Sciences
alexch@vega.protres.ru
Fax: +7(095) 924-0493
Phone: +7(0967) 73-2524

 
Helena Chetverina, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist
helena@vega.protres.ru
Phone: +7(0967) 73-5755
Victor Ugarov, Ph.D.
Scientist
vugarov@vega.protres.ru
Phone: +7(0967) 73-8916
Alexander Demidenko
Junior Scientist
dem@vega.protres.ru
Phone: +7(0967) 73-5755

 
Timur Samatov
Postgraduate
tim@vega.protres.ru
Phone: +7(0967) 73-5755
Damir Kopein
Student
kopein@vega.protres.ru
Phone: +7(0967) 73-5755

 
Tatiana Popkova
Leading Engineer
t_popkova@mail.ru
Phone:  +7(0967) 73-5755
 
Lyudmila Tolstova
1st Category Engineer
Phone:  +7(0967) 73-8909
Nadezhda Androsova
Senior Technician
Phone: +7(0967) 73-8998
 
Larissa Shutova
Senior Technician
Phone: +7(0967) 73-8999


Historical Background


    The group has been set up in order to develop a technology for efficient cell-free amplification of RNAs. The project was inspired by the anticipation of a birth of recombinant RNA technology (Lewin, 1983) raised by the observation that Qb replicase (RNA-directed RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli phage Qb) can amplify a recombinant RNA comprising a 10 nt-long foreign sequence embedded within a natural replicase template (Miele et al., 1983). This seemed to be the breakthrough in desperate attempts to overcome a strict template specificity of Qb replicase, an enzyme famous, since its discovery in Sol Spiegelman's lab (Haruna and Spiegelman, 1965), for the unique ability to exponentially amplify cognate RNAs in isothermal cell-free reactions.
    However, approaching that goal did not look as driving on a highway. There was another challenging problem with Qb replicase, the spontaneous RNA synthesis. Although Qb replicase did not amplify any foreign RNA tested, it produced a variety of replicable RNA species (we proposed to call them RQ RNAs for being Replicable by Qb replicase) when provided with the complete rNTP mixture (ATP, GTP, CTP and UTP) and no template. RQ RNAs rapidly overgrew any recombinant RNA (and even the genomic Qb RNA) added to the reaction. Thorough experiments carried out in Manfred Eigen's lab ruled out the possibility that these RNAs contaminated the Qb replicase preparations, advancing the authors to the hypothesis that Qb replicase can synthesize RNAs without any template (de novo) by virtue of random condensation of nucleotides, with the fortuitous formation of replicable molecules which then manage to evolve into rapidly amplifiable species within the span of the reaction time (Sumper and Luce, 1975; Biebricher et al., 1986). Thus, the background RNA synthesis appeared to be an innate property of Qb replicase that would make impracticable any use of Qb replicase for the amplification of desired recombinant RNAs.
    On a long ways towards uncovering the nature of the spontaneous RNA synthesis [reviewed both in English (Chetverin and Spirin, 1995) and in Russian (Chetverin, 1996; Chetverin, 1998)] we have made several important findings and inventions.

Molecular Colony Technique:
It can do everything the traditional in vivo gene cloning can, and much more


RNA colonies
in an agarose gel containing
Qb replicase and rNTPs
(revealed by hybridization with a labeled probe; gel size 18?18 mm)
DNA colonies
in a polyacrylamide gel containing
PCR reaction components
(revealed by hybridization with a labeled probe; gel diameter 14 mm)



     MCT is a method of amplifying nucleic acids (RNA or DNA) in a gel layer. In this format, the progeny of each molecule forms a colony, rather than spreads throughout the reaction volume. Each colony comprises multiple (some billion) copies of one original molecule (i.e., a clone), and the number of colonies indicates the number of nucleic acid molecules initially present in the gel. In the original version of MCT, the gel was agarose containing Qb replicase and rNTPs. This technique allowed us to demonstrate, in Pasteur-like experiments, that the spontaneous synthesis is caused by airborne Qb satellite RNA molecules which contaminate the environment in the laboratories where Qb phage-derived RNAs are studied (Chetverin et al., 1991; Chetverina and Chetverin, 1993). Those experiments indicated that the interference from background RNA synthesis can be substantially reduced by protecting samples from the environment and carrying out amplification reactions in immobilized media, which prevents competition between different templates whose progeny is not allowed to spread throughout the reaction volume.
    Of course, the potentials of MCT are greater than just the demonstration of airborne replicable RNAs. The unique feature of MCT distinguishing it from other methods for nucleic acid amplification is that amplified molecules are spatially separated. This results in a weakening or (given the sample is properly diluted) complete elimination of a competition between the molecular species; allows the individual amplifiable molecules to be monitored, counted and analyzed; provides for a direct high-throughput screening of a large number of molecules; and makes the isolation of homogeneous molecule populations (cloning) possible.
    MCT has become the basic method of the laboratory (see Current projects). We used Qb replicase-MCT to create the first purified cell-free system of RNA recombination (Chetverin et al., 1997). Recently, another version of MCT, employing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to grow DNA colonies in a polyacrylamide gel, has been worked out.

Possible applications of MCT include:

    All these applications are currently being developed in the laboratory. MCT is patented in Russia and in the United States.


Other Projects

Cell-free gene expression



    Uncovering the nature of the background RNA synthesis encouraged further attempts of employing Qb replicase for cell-free amplification of desired RNAs, primarily mRNAs. Unfortunately, it turned out that while recombinant RQ RNAs carrying some short (up to 50 nt) inserts replicate perfectly, longer recombinants can be read only once because the plus and minus strands collapse into inactive duplexes. However, in collaboration with the Laboratory of Protein Biosynthesis Mechanisms we have found that recombinant RQ RNAs carrying long mRNA inserts (RQ-mRNAs) can be efficiently amplified by Qb replicase if replication is coupled with their translation in a cell-free system. In this case, ribosomes promote RNA amplification by preventing the translated plus (sense) strands from annealing with the complementary minus strands. This also results in a preferential accumulation of the sense strands which is advantageous for translation (Morozov et al., 1993). This discovery has been patented jointly with collaborators from the Public Health Research Institute, USA. Furthermore, we found that RQ RNAs with their strong secondary structure efficiently protect the harbored mRNAs from endogenous exoribonucleases contained in the lysates used for cell-free translation (Ugarov et al., 1994). Cumulatively, these effects result in up to 100-fold increase of the yield of synthesized proteins.
    These findings allowed us to develop versatile expression vectors for cell-free systems (Alimov et al., 2000). The vectors are designed to produce a functionally active protein carrying the Strep-tag oligopeptide (Schmidt and Skerra, 1994) at its C-terminus, and can be used in translation, transcription-translation, or replication-translation reactions. Depending on the reaction type, it yields up to 40 mg per ml, or about 1 nmol of a standard protein. The presence of Strep-tag allows the synthesized protein to be easily isolated on a streptavidin-agarose column under mild conditions, the entire procedure being completed within one working day. The results show that standard low cost cell-free systems can serve for rapid preparation of purified proteins in amounts that can suffice a number of needs of a research laboratory.


Sequencing on oligonucleotide arrays

    During his 2-year work (from August, 1990, to July, 1992) in the Public Health Research Institute (New York city, USA) as a visiting investigator at the laboratory of Dr. F. R. Kramer, Dr. Chetverin has invented novel types of oligonucleotide arrays and methods of their use for parallel sorting, isolating, manipulating, and sequencing thousands, and even millions, of nucleic acid species.
    By that time it was realized that nucleic acids can be sequenced by hybridizing them to an array of all possible oligonucleotides of a given length; this approach was called SBH (Sequencing By Hybridization: Bains and Smith, 1988; Lysov et al., 1988). An oligonucleotide array is comprised of a number of individual oligonucleotide species tethered to the surface of a solid support in a regular pattern, each one in a different area, so that the location of each species is known. Such an array can be prepared by a parallel synthesis of all the oligonucleotides, directly on the support, employing the methods of solid-phase chemical synthesis in combination with site-directed masks (Fodor et al., 1991). For example, an array of 48 = 65,536 possible octanucleotides (8-mers) can be synthesized in just 32 reaction steps. Hybridization of a nucleic acid strand to such an array will provide the list of all 8-mers constituting the strand, and the strand sequence can, in principle, be reconstructed by overlapping the 8-mers at their 7 nt-long subsequences. However, if there are non-unique 7-mers in the strand (which is common for sequences longer than 200 nt), its sequence cannot be reconstructed unambiguously.
    The new methodology invented by Dr. Chetverin overcomes this problem (Chetverin and Kramer, 1993). Moreover, it allows the entire large diploid genomes (such as the human genome) to be sequenced in a fully automated fashion and without the need for cloning or mapping. The proposed strategy includes digestion of the genomic DNA by a restriction endonuclease and sorting the generated fragments into a large number of pools by hybridizing their termini with a comprehensive oligonucleotide array. The unseparated fragments in each pool are amplified in situ and converted into nested partials (i.e., strands truncated at one end to any possible extent) that are sorted on another oligonucleotide array by their truncated termini. Hybridization of partials sharing same terminal sequence, separately for each type of termini, reveals both the identity and the order of the oligonucleotides belonging to each fragment in the pool, including allelic variants of the fragment. Oligonucleotide arrays are then used to order the sequenced fragments and to allocate their allelic variations to sister chromosomes (Chetverin and Kramer, 1994). A series of patent applications has been submitted by the Public Health Research Institute, and the first of them has been approved. Recently, this invention has been licensed to Affymetrix, Inc., the world leader in manufacturing oligonucleotide arrays.
    After his return to Russia, Dr. Chetverin initiated a project supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, which resulted in the development of efficient computer algorithms allowing not only nucleotide sequences to be unambiguously reconstructed from "idealized" data sets produced by the proposed methods (Razgulyaev et al., 1995), but also most of the inevitable experimental errors to be filtered out.


Plasmid Isolation without Ribonucleases

    Plasmids are widely used in bioresearch laboratories, and a number of rapid and inexpensive methods for plasmid purification have been developed that employ pancreatic RNase to destroy cellular RNA. However, because of its high stability, RNase almost inevitably contaminates the laboratory, which may be detrimental for experiments employing RNA. Since a major part of our work involves RNAs and the isolation of hundreds of plasmids, there was an urgent need for a simple method that would ensure an RNase-free environment. Such a method has been developed in this laboratory (Ugarov et al., 1999).
 
The key step of the new protocol is degradation of RNA by heating in the presence of a high Mg2+ concentration rather than by the use of RNase. Conditions of the treatment ensure preservation of the native structure of plasmid DNA and result in plasmid DNA that is indistinguishable from that prepared by the CsCl method. The procedure can also be used in other applications that require removal of RNA from DNA samples.


Current Projects


RNA recombination

    Recombinations between and within RNA molecules are rare, yet biologically important events that form a basis for the evolution and diversity of RNA viruses which account for most of the known viral pathogens and for the generation of defective interfering RNAs which attenuate viral infections. Our recent finding of the ability of RNAs to self-recombine (Chetverina et al., 1999) suggests that RNA recombination may also involve cellular RNAs resulting (by means of reverse transcription and integration) in alterations in the chromosomal DNA, and might have been a mechanism for evolution in the prebiotic RNA world.
 

    Recently, we have used Qb replicase-MCT to develop a cell-free system in which the entire process, from mixing the parental RNAs and up to amplification of recombinant molecules, can be strictly controlled (Chetverin et al., 1997). This system uses the 5' and 3' fragments of RQ135 RNA, a Qb phage satellite and one of the most potent natural Qb replicase templates (Munishkin et al., 1991). None of the fragments is capable of amplification by Qb replicase. However, joint incubation of the fragments results in a recombination between them producing replicable RNAs detectable as RNA colonies. With this first purified cell-free system, we have been able to directly demonstrate that RNA molecules can recombine without DNA intermediates.
    Prior to our work, the mechanism of RNA recombination remained obscure and it was commonly believed that recombinant molecules are generated during RNA synthesis by viral replicase which switches to another template after it has copied a portion of the first template (the template switch mechanism). Our experiments in the cell-free system have provided evidence for at least two chemically distinct mechanisms of RNA recombination, both differing from template switch (Chetverin, 1999).
    If a mixture of the RNA fragments is directly added to the Qb replicase-containing agarose layer, recombination between them results in the incorporation of the entire 5' fragment into the recombinant sequence and requires the presence at the 5' fragment of the free 3'-OH group, suggesting that recombination might occur via a splicing-like trans-esterification reaction in which that group attacks phosphoester bonds within the 3' fragment (Chetverin et al., 1997; Chetverin, 1997).

In the presence of Qb replicase and rNTPs, recombination occurs
by a mechanism different from template switch

Nonreplicative RNA recombination in the presence of Qb replicase and rNTPs, compared to recombination of the same RNAs by AMV reverse transcriptase which served as a template switch control. Yellow lines indicate the manner in which the fragment sequences become joined in the recombinant molecules. The nucleotides of the natural RQ RNA sequence are shown in black; the nucleotides of foreign extensions are colored, of which those from homologous segments are in red.
Template switch at a homologous segment in the presence of reverse transcriptase

Recombinants formed in the presence of Qb replicase

RNA recombination in the presence of Qb replicase does not occur
if the 3' terminus of the 5' fragment is modified

    The 3'-OH requirement has allowed us to separate the step of recombinant formation from its amplification, by incubating the fragment mixture under chosen conditions, and then oxidizing it with NaIO4 to eliminate 3' hydroxyls and thereby to prevent further recombination by the above mechanism during colony growth. It turned out that (i) the above mechanism requires the presence of Qb replicase; (ii) in the absence of replicase, RNA fragments can self-recombine; (iii) the rate of self-recombination is several orders of magnitude lower; (iv) self-recombination does not involve 3' hydroxyls; instead, the fragments react by internal nucleotides which suggests the involvement of 2' hydroxyls; (v) the only requirement of self-recombination is the presence of Mg2+ ions; (vi) self-recombination is sequence-nonspecific, indicating that cryptic ribozyme structures are not involved; (vii) self-recombination can also occur in cis, resulting in a deletion of mRNA inserts from RQ-mRNAs (Chetverina et al., 1999).

Nonreplicative recombination in the absence of Qb replicase and rNTPs (self-recombination)

   Despite its low rate, RNA self-recombination might play an important evolutionary role both in the prebiotic RNA world and in the contemporary DNA world. At the rate of 10–9 nt-1h-1 as observed in vitro, a new recombinant RNA would arise in a human cell every minute, yielding up to 1020 recombinant molecules during the life span of the human body. Reverse transcription and integration of even a minute fraction of the rearranged sequences would change the genome significantly.
    The question inevitably arises: to what extent are the conclusions made from in vitro data valid for the natural systems? This issue has been recently addressed in similar experiments on recombination between nonreplicable and nontranslatable fragments of the poliovirus RNA, carried out in collaboration with Prof. V. I. Agol's laboratory at the Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, Moscow (Gmyl et al., 1999). Upon transfecting appropriate cells, the fragments did produce viable viral genomes demonstrating that nonreplicative (non-template switch) recombination can also occur in vivo. The results show that, similar to self-recombination, the 3' hydroxyls do not participate in the reaction, and suggest an involvement of the 2' hydroxyls and 2',3' cyclic phosphate intermediates. Importantly, the rate of the nonreplicative recombination in vivo is several orders of magnitude higher than that of self-recombination in vitro indicating that cell milieu may enhance RNA recombination by the 3' hydroxyl-independent mechanism.
    Currently, our efforts are aimed at deciphering the role of Qb replicase in RNA recombination. As seen from the above, Qb replicase not just accelerates recombination, but changes its mechanism. The questions under investigation are:


DNA colonies


    While Qb replicase-MCT performs very well in the RNA recombination studies, it proved not as effective in other potential applications. We have found that many inserts, even short, do inhibit replication of RQ RNAs because of the structural requirements Qb replicase imposes on its templates. Therefore, we have switched our attention to DNA colonies obtainable by PCR-MCT.

    The most obvious application of PCR-MCT is for nucleic acid diagnostics. The MCT format is able to overcome the conceptual problems inherent to the solution PCR (S-PCR, including RT-PCR), such as the sensitivity loss due to a competition from background amplification (caused by false priming on non-target sequences often present in the sample in a great excess over the target), preferential amplification of some templates over others, and template recombination (during the amplification of heterozygous samples and multigene families, and in multiplex PCR). In PCR-MCT, different molecules amplify at different locations that eliminates any competition and prevents recombination between them.
    Besides the sensitivity and reliability offered by PCR-MCT in detecting a target, its greatest power is in QUANTITATIVE diagnostic assays. There is an increasing demand for such assays, as one can judge from the current biomedical publications. Quantitative assay for a virus is important for observing the disease progression and the efficacy of the medicine being taken, and for optimizing the treatment. The need for a reliable quantitative assay is even more urgent in the case of cancer diagnostics. While the detection of a viral DNA or RNA is sufficient for diagnosing viral infection (provided that sample carryovers are excluded), the presence of a specific mRNA does not necessarily indicates malignancy; this is because many, if not all, cancer genes are also expressed in normal cells, albeit at a much lower level.
    There are several reasons to prefer PCR-MCT for quantitative assays.
 
 
  • PCR-MCT is more accurate
PCR-MCT directly counts the number of colonies, whereas S-PCR relies on the signal intensity measurements which are inherently error prone. In S-PCR, the target is assayed by determining the cycle at which the signal becomes detectable; and, since there is an exponential relationship between the cycle number and the input number of target molecules, the assay error is an exponential function of the cycle determination error.
  • PCR-MCT is more reliable
The results of S-PCR assays (which rely on the intensity measurements) are greatly affected by small variations in the reaction conditions (e.g., an uneven temperature distribution in the heating block, composition of the reaction mixture, the rate of DNA polymerase inactivation, etc.). In contrast, in PCR-MCT, such variation can only affect the size of DNA colonies, but not their number.
  • PCR-MCT prevents interference between DNA species
While PCR-MCT directly determines the number of target molecules, S-PCR measures it indirectly, by referring to the signal produced by a known number of molecules of an internal standard (IS) added to the sample. However, because of mutual competition between the two species, even small difference in the amplification rates or in the input number of the IS and target results in a great assay error. In contrast, inasmuch as in PCR-MCT, DNA species are spatially separated which precludes any competition between them, different amplification rates will affect the size of DNA colonies, rather than their number.

    A laboratory protocol for PCR-MCT assay has been developed in the laboratory, and there should be no major difficulties in transferring the technology to the market (at least, in the form of kits that could be sold to research laboratories as the first step). We are not aware of any other competitive technology. Since PCR is a very popular technique, PCR-MCT should be readily accepted by research and diagnostic laboratories.

    One more our task is cell-free gene cloning. Now we can grow colonies of long (up to 2 Kbp) DNA fragments and transcribe them in situ. Currently our efforts are aimed to the gene translation in molecular colonies. Completion of this part of work will allow the entire gene cloning process, up to its identification according to the function of the encoded protein, to be performed in vitro. The developed protocol could be used, instead of the traditional in vivo protocols, for the cloning of any cDNAs, the locations of the sought DNA colonies being revealed by their ability to bind a specific ligand or antibody, or to perform some enzymatic reaction. In combination with the ribosome display or mRNA-protein fusion methodologies it can also be used for a direct screening of specific single-chain antibodies, catalytic antibodies and other engineered proteins or peptides as an alternative to the phage display. The advantages of the in vitro cloning format are the ease of screening, the homogeneity of the expression products, the absence of a natural (cell or phage) selection pressure, and the possibility of obtaining proteins or polypeptides that contain unnatural aminoacids.


Selected Publications


Munishkin, A. V., Voronin, L. A., and Chetverin, A. B. (1988). An in vivo recombinant RNA capable of autocatalytic synthesis by Qb replicase. Nature  333, 473-475.
Reported on finding in the products of the so-called spontaneous RNA synthesis of RQ120 RNA that turned out to be a recombinant RNA composed of pieces of the genomic Qb phage RNA and an E. coli tRNAAsp. Marked the discovery of RNA-RNA recombination in prokaryotic systems.
Munishkin, A. V., Voronin, L. A., Ugarov, V. I., Bondareva, L. A., Chetverina, H. V., and Chetverin, A. B. (1991). Efficient templates for Qb replicase are formed by recombination from heterologous sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 221, 463-472.
Reported another natural recombinant, RQ135 RNA, mainly composed of pieces of E. coli 23S ribosomal RNA. This finding indicated that recombination could occur between cellular RNAs only, without the participation of a viral RNA, and that presence of viral sequences is not required for RNA replication. RQ135 RNA proved to be one of the best Qb replicase template, and since then was routinely used in this laboratory as an RNA vector.
Chetverin, A. B., Chetverina, H. V., and Munishkin, A. V. (1991). On the nature of spontaneous RNA synthesis by Qb replicase. J. Mol. Biol.  222, 3-9.
Marked the invention of the molecular colony technique (MCT). Reported on the use of MCT in Pasteur-like experiments demonstrating that the "spontaneous" RNA synthesis is caused by airborne RQ RNAs. Also reported on the presence of RQ RNAs in the Qb phage particles, that marked the discovery of satellite RNAs in bacteriophages.
Chetverina, H. V., and Chetverin, A. B. (1993). Cloning of RNA molecules in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res.21, 2349-2353.
Described a greatly improved Qb replicase version of MCT. Directly demonstrated that RNA colonies comprise molecular clones.
Morozov, I. Yu., Ugarov, V. I., Chetverin, A. B., and Spirin, A. S. (1993). Synergism in replication and translation of messenger RNA in a cell-free system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 9325-9329.
Described the first cell-free system for a coupled replication-translation of a recombinant RQ-mRNA. Demonstrated that long foreign inserts inhibited replication of RQ RNAs, but that recombinant RNAs could be replicated if they were also involved in translation. Marked the invention of coupled replication-translation methods.
Chetverin, A. B., and Kramer, F. R. (1993). Sequencing of pools of nucleic acids on oligonucleotide arrays. BioSystems30, 215-231.
The first publication on principles of the Sequencing by Nested Strand Hybridization (SNSH) describing how unseparated pools of unknown nucleic acids can be sequenced by hybridization with oligonucleotide arrays without invoking any other information.
Chetverin, A. B., and Kramer, F. R. (1994). Oligonucleotide arrays: New concepts and possibilities. Bio/Technology12, 1093-1100.
A review on various uses of oligonucleotide arrays, with a special attention to methods (sorting, manipulating and sequencing nucleic acids on oligonucleotide arrays, including direct sequencing of diploid genomes) invented by the authors.
Ugarov, V. I., Morozov, I. Yu., Jung, G. Y., Chetverin, A. B., and Spirin, A. S. (1994). Expression and stability of recombinant RQ-mRNAs in cell-free translation systems. FEBS Lett. 341, 131-134.
Demonstrated that expression of mRNAs in cell-free E. coli translation systems is greatly enhanced as a result of their insertion into an RQ RNA vector, mainly due to protection of the recombinant RNAs against endogenous ribonucleases.
Razgulyaev, O., Rubinov, A., Gelfand, M., and Chetverin, A. (1995). Sequencing potential of nested strand hybridization. J. Computational Biol. 2, 383-395.
Reported computer simulations of SNSH that demonstrated the potentials of the method and its advantages over the ordinary sequencing by hybridization (SBH).
Chetverin, A. B., and Spirin, A. S. (1995). Replicable RNA vectors: Prospects for cell-free gene amplification, expression and cloning. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 51, 225-270.
A review on the properties of Qbreplicase and RQ RNAs, with a special attention to the problem of spontaneous RNA synthesis and to the problems and possible applications of the recombinant RNA technology.
Chetverin, A. B. (1996). Cell-free system for RNA amplification, expression and cloning. Mol. Biol. (Moscow, English translation) 30(1), 579-584.
A review on the studies of RQ RNAs in the author's laboratory, with a special attention to the problem of spontaneous RNA synthesis.
Chetverin, A. B., Chetverina, H. V., Demidenko, A. A., and Ugarov, V. I. (1997). Nonhomologous RNA recombination in a cell-free system: evidence for a transesterification mechanism guided by secondary structure. Cell88, 503-513.
Reported the first purified cell-free system for RNA recombination. Provided the first direct evidence that RNAs can recombine without a DNA intermediate and do this by a mechanism different from template switch.
Chetverin, A. B. (1997). Recombination in bacteriophage Qb and its satellite RNAs: the in vivo and in vitro studies. Seminars Virol.  8, 121-129.
A review on the studies of RNA recombination in single-stranded RNA phages, with a special attention to the in vitro studies in the author's laboratory.
Chetverin, A. B. (1998). Bacteriophage Qb as a subject of molecular biology. Uspekhi Biologicheskoi Khimii (Advances in Biological Chemistry, in Russian) 38, 3-75.
A review on the studies of single-stranded RNA phages, their replicases and satellite RNAs, also discussing the impact those studies have produced on the developments in molecular biology.
Ugarov, V. I., Samatov, T. R., Chetverina, H. V., and Chetverin, A. B. (1999). Plasmid purification using hot Mg2+ treatment and no RNase. BioTechniques26, 194-198.
Reported a method for low-cost and rapid isolation of high quality plasmids without any use of RNases. This can be a method of choice for the laboratories where ensuring an RNase-free environment is important.
Chetverina, H. V., Demidenko, A. A., Ugarov, V. I., and Chetverin, A. B. (1999). Spontaneous rearrangements in RNA sequences. FEBS Lett. 450, 89-94.
Demonstrated that RNAs can recombine at physiologically significant rates, both in cis and in trans, in the absence of any protein or ribozyme. Marked the discovery of the intrinsic ability of RNA molecules to recombine.
Chetverin, A. B. (1999). The puzzle of RNA recombination. FEBS Lett.  460, 1-5.
A critical review of the data and hypothesis on RNA recombination, discussing the differences between, and possible mechanisms of, the homologous and nonhomologous recombination.
Gmyl, A. P., Belousov, E. V., Maslova, S. V., Khitrina, E. V., Chetverin, A. B., and Agol, V. I. (1999). Nonreplicative RNA recombination in poliovirus. J. Virol. 73, 8958-8965.
Demonstrated that viral RNAs can recombine in vivo in the absence of a viral RNA replicase, i.e., by a mechanism different from template switch.
Alimov, A. P., Khmelnitsky, A. Yu., Simonenko, P. N., Spirin, A. S., and Chetverin, A. B. (2000). Cell-free synthesis and affinity isolation of proteins on a nanomole scale. BioTechniques28, 338-344.
Described the vectors and techniques allowing significant amount of pure proteins to be produced in E. coli cell-free translation systems.

Patents


On the Molecular Colony Technique*
in Russia
    Chetverin, A. B., and Chetverina, E. V. (1995). Method of nucleic acid copying, method of their expression and a medium for their realization. Patent RU 2,048,522.
    Chetverin, A. B., and Chetverina, E. V. (1998). Method of nucleic acid cloning. Patent RU 2,114,175.
    Chetverin, A. B., and Chetverina, E. V. (1998). Method of identification of nucleic acid. Patent RU 2,114,915.
in the United States
    Chetverin, A. B., and Chetverina, H. V. (1997). Method for amplification of nucleic acids in solid media. U.S. Patent 5,616,478.
    Chetverin, A. B., and Chetverina, H. V. (1999). Method for amplification of nucleic acids in solid media and its application for nucleic acid cloning and diagnostics. U.S. Patent 5,958,698.
    Chetverin, A. B., and Chetverina, H. V. (1999). Solid medium for amplification and expression of nucleic acids as colonies. U.S. Patent 6,001,568.

* The title and rights to the invention belong to the Institute of Protein Research. All inquiries regarding licensing the invention should be addressed to: William J. Hone, Esq., Fish & Richardson P. C., 45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2800, New York, NY 10111; phone +1 (212) 641-2270,
fax +1 (212) 258-2291, e-mail hone@fr.com.
Other patents

    Wu, Y., Ryabova, L. A., Kurnasov, O. V., Morozov, I. Yu., Ugarov, V. I., Volianik, E. V., Chetverin, A. B., Zhang, D., Kramer, F. R., and Spirin, A. S. (1996). Coupled replication-translation methods and kits for protein synthesis. U.S. Patent 5,556,769.

    Chetverin, A. B., and Kramer, F. R. (2000). Method of sorting a mixture of nucleic acid strands on a binary array. U.S. Patent 6,103,463.


Sponsors and Grants

Russian Foundation for Basic Research
1993-1995: Cell-free cloning of nucleic acid molecules and study of the RNA recombination mechanism
1996-1998: Ultrasensitive diagnostics of viruses
1996-1998: Studying intermolecular RNA recombination in vitro
1999-2002: Mechanism of RNA recombination
U.S. Department of Energy, Human Genome Program
1993-1994: A Method for Direct Sequencing of Diploid Genomes on Oligonucleotide Arrays: Theoretical Analysis and Computer Modeling
International Science Foundation
1994-1995: Studying RNA recombination in the Qb system
Howard Hughes Medical Institutes
1995-2001: Cell-free Molecular Cloning
2001-2005: Molecular Colony Technique as a Tool for Biomedical Research and Clinical Practice  NEW
International Association for the promotion of co-operation with scientists from the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (INTAS)
1996-1998: Replication of the Genome of Positive Strand RNA Viruses
1999-2001: Replication and Recombination of the Genome of Positive Strand RNA Viruses and Cellular Responses to Viral Infection


Other References


 

Last updated March 28, 2001

Click here to request a reprint or to ask a question

Main page of the Institute of Protein Research

The List of Russian Web Servers WebList.Ru